@Article{MonteiroBrPrMoSoLiLo:2020:EvImFu,
author = "Monteiro, Lara M. and Brum, Fernanda Thiesen and Pressey, Robert
L. and Morellato, Leonor Patricia C. and Soares Filho, Britaldo
and Lima Ribeiro, Matheus S. and Loyola, Rafael",
affiliation = "{Universidade Federal de Goi{\'a}s (UFG)} and {Universidade
Federal de Goi{\'a}s (UFG)} and {James Cook University} and
{Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)} and {Universidade Federal
de Minas Gerais (UFMG)} and {Universidade Federal de Goi{\'a}s
(UFG)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "Evaluating the impact of future actions in minimizing vegetation
loss from land conversion in the Brazilian Cerrado under climate
change",
journal = "Biodiversity and Conservation",
year = "2020",
volume = "29",
number = "5",
pages = "1701--1722",
month = "apr.",
note = "{Pr{\^e}mio CAPES Elsevier 2023 - ODS 15: Vida terrestre}",
keywords = "Dynamic site selection · Impact evaluation · Land conversion ·
Protected areas · Spatial Conservation Prioritization · Threatened
plants.",
abstract = "The global network of protected areas (PAs) is systematically
biased towards remote and unproductive places. Consequently, the
processes threatening biodiversity are not halted and conservation
impactdefned as the benefcial environmental outcomes arising from
protection relative to the counterfactual of no interventionis
smaller than previously thought. Yet, many conservation plans
still target species representation, which can fail to lead to
impact by not considering the threats they face, such as land
conversion and climate change. Here we aimed to identify spatial
conservation priorities that minimize the risk of land conversion,
while retaining sites with high value for threatened plants at
risk from climate change in the Brazilian Cerrado. We compared a
method of sequential implementation of conservation actions to a
static strategy applied at one time-step. For both schedules of
conservation actions, we applied two methods for setting
priorities: (i) minimizing expected habitat conversion and
prioritizing valuable sites for threatened plants (therefore
maximizing conservation impact), and (ii) prioritizing sites based
only on their value for threatened plants, regardless of their
vulnerability to land conversion (therefore maximizing
representation). We found that scenarios aimed at maximizing
conservation impact reduced total vegetation loss, while still
covering large proportions of species ranges inside PAs and
priority sites. Given that planning to avoid vegetation loss
provided these benefts, vegetation information could represent a
reliable surrogate for overall biodiversity. Besides allowing for
the achievement of two distinct goals (representation and impact),
the impact strategies also present great potential for
implementation, especially under current conservation policies.",
doi = "10.1007/s10531-018-1627-6",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1627-6",
issn = "0960-3115",
language = "en",
targetfile = "monteiro_evaluating.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "27 abr. 2024"
}